Recently, a friend asked the question of how to buy an entry-level router, and just as another friend had a Super Video Router and a 360 P1 Secure Router, both of them happened to be priced at 99 yuan. Since a friend asks this question, it's better to spend time doing a comparative evaluation and make a simple evaluation from the aspects of appearance, extension, and performance. It may also be part of the needs of users. After all, there are too many brands on the market and it is a headache to choose them.
First, appearance:
A black and white, music as the router is used in black packaging, 360 used in the white packaging, feel more 360 ​​content, music is obviously a bit rough. After all, prices are there, and naturally there is no need to put too much effort on the packaging.
Accessories are also exactly the same, perhaps already standard, rechargeable head, host plus manual style.
The overall two routers are still not very ugly, leaving a lot of openings on the back, 350 p1 metal panel used in the front panel, more texture, music as the router uses a non-metallic material and made a frosted treatment, in the antenna It is also different, 360 adjustable front and rear, music as the router is about.
In terms of opening holes, 360 is a 4+1 match, and it is considered as a 2+1 match. There are more than two 360 interfaces, and the more selective ones, do not support USB expansion as a pity.
Both have a gradient design and look thinner in 360. The breathing light is designed in front of the music and the 360 ​​is designed on the panel.
Second, product details comparison:
When they got the two products, they found that there was a big difference in weight. They were happy to be 185g; 360 was 281.2g; 360 weighed nearly 100g. Originally wanted to dismantling to see the interior, and later found LeTV case as a one-time installation, violent dismantling will lead to unrecoverable so I gave up this idea, the weight difference of one hundred grams of 360 front metal panel weight, may also have circuit board Have other aspects of the material used.
There is also some difference between the two power adapters. The LeTV input is 12v~1.0A; the input of the 360P1 is 9V~500mA; so it seems that it should be 360p1 to save power? Then look at the actual test data:
Through the measurement of the power meter, it can be intuitively seen that Le is 1.9 watts and 360p1 is 1.5 watts. The energy consumption of the two is not large, just as the parameters of the 360 ​​are more power-efficient.
Third, APP
The so-called smart router is to add a controllable intelligent module on the traditional router, remotely through the mobile phone, parameter modification, etc., so the function of the APP for the smart router determines the richness of the product, through the APP of the two routers Look, music as the router is relatively simple, including one member may share the welfare of LeTV member fans; and 360 P1 is obviously a lot of professional, first security module takes up a large plate, of course, this is the 360's housekeeping skills, In addition to these there are also more extensive extensions and smart home modules. The APP is more perfect. The 360's wireless relay function is also worth mentioning.
Fourth, performance comparison test:
LeTV router uses 16m+128m high-pass solution, dual antenna design, support 300Mbps connection speed, equipped with OpenWRT system and with mobile app control.
The 360 ​​P1 router uses 802.11n technology, two 5dBi antennas, a 10/100Mbps WAN port, four 10/100Mbps LAN ports, and a maximum transmission rate of 300Mbps.
Test one: Put two routers in the same position as much as possible, select three locations to test the signal of a router, green is 360p1, yellow is LeTV router, there is a blue for another router, in the third The difference between the test data obtained by different points is not significant, and it can be seen that the positioning of the two is similar. If you just want to say 360 is a little stronger then a little bit, then the degree of stability? To know that the strength of the signal does not mean that the connection is stable, we next look at the next picture.
The above picture shows the signal fluctuations of the two routers in the nearest distance, the color is still green 360, and yellow is LeTV. In terms of stability, the 360P1 has obvious advantages and is just too smooth. It can be seen that p1 in the test is still very stable. Stability knows, then the actual experience? The author's home is 100M Great Wall Broadband. After networking, he regretted it. The key is four years. . . It is mainly due to the instability of Internet speed. So the following figure is just an unconventional test.
The two routers conducted three network speed tests respectively, and found that each of the three times was a form of incremental increase. Let's get a feel for it. There is no stable network source that can't really make comments. However, both routers also performed well.
Summary: Both routers are priced below $100, and the price/performance ratio is extremely high. Unfortunately, neither of them has 5G frequencies. Users who want to experience 5G WiFi still choose a higher level, and comparing the two is also a matter of merit. After all, there is no 360 experience in music as a route, there are certain advantages in the functional and technical maturity. Comparison of evaluation does not stand on any side of the perspective, just have two super price-performance routers with the same price at hand, do a regular evaluation, and the willingness to purchase will be appreciated by everyone. Thank you for watching.
Motorcycle Batteries,Mf Motorcycle Batteries,Mf Motor Batteries,Lead-Acid Motor Batteries
Shaoxing Honyo International Trading Co., Ltd , https://www.honyopower.com